What Criteria Do Analysts Use to Evaluate PLM for Process Manufacturing?
Two independent firms published evaluations of this market in 2026, using different frameworks.
QKS Group SPARK Matrix™
The QKS Group SPARK Matrix™ for PLM for Process Manufacturing scores vendors on two axes, Technology Excellence and Customer Impact, and publishes the weighting of each criterion. The Technology Excellence weightings are:
| Criterion |
Weight |
| Recipe and formulation management |
20% |
| Compliance and regulatory management |
15% |
| Specification data management |
15% |
| Quality management |
12% |
| Packaging and artwork management |
10% |
| Product development |
10% |
| Product data management |
8% |
| Integration and interoperability |
5% |
| Vision and roadmap |
5% |
On the Customer Impact axis, product strategy and performance and market presence carry 20 percent each, with proven record, ease of deployment and use, customer service excellence and unique value proposition at 15 percent each.
The ordering is the useful part. Formulation carries more weight than compliance. A platform that treats formulation as a module added to a general-purpose system is being measured against the opposite assumption.
ARC Advisory Group MarketMap
The ARC MarketMap for Formulation Technologies evaluated seventeen formulation technology providers worldwide, including Dassault Systemes, Infor, Oracle, SAP, Siemens and Veeva Systems. Providers were scored across two equally weighted dimensions, Solution Capabilities and Strategic Vision, using live capability demonstrations, detailed questionnaires and independent research.
Source: ARC Advisory Group Inc. Used under license.